The debate between high stakes (Standardized tests) and teacher-made tests has become a considerably important topic in the field of education. Standardized tests have been increasingly discussed since the passing of No Child Left Behind. Teachers, parents, and children alike agree that Standardized tests are often too challenging and cause a great deal of anxiety in students (especially in the lower elementary). This conflicts with Arne Duncan's belief that "Current standardized assessment formats do a poor job of challenging students." Others argue that there is not enough emphasis placed on the significance of teacher-made assessments.
Despite the argument about standardized testing, many would agree that they play a pivotal role in assessing our students. They are one method of ensuring that students are learning the skills and information that is necessary in order for them to become successful members of our society. Therefore, I agree that standardized tests should challenge student to think critically and reach their full potential. This can be done in a variety of ways. One way is to ask questions that are formatted as scenarios. Students could be asked to place themselves in the shoes of others in order to affirm a strong understanding of the material. It would also be beneficial for students to be asked questions using a variety of different formats. Students perform differently when answering various types of questions. For instance, some students may dread fill-in-the-blank or forced response questions, but flourish when completing essay questions.
It may also be especially beneficial for administrators and government officials to focus more evenly on the results of various teacher-made assessments when evaluating students. Teachers are able to assess their students' critical-thinking skills through both hands-on activities and paper-pencil exams. Doing this would also provide a better idea of what our students are truly capable of.
No comments:
Post a Comment